לאור אירועי המלחמה בין ישראל לחמאס בעזה נרשם גידול משמעותי באנטישמיות בקנדה, נגד יהודים וישראלים. זאת, בדומה לגידול באנטישמיות בארצות הברית הסמוכה ומדינות אירופה השונות. בקנדה יש לזכור קיים הריכוז של היהודים מהגדולים בעולם (מחוץ לישראל)
בשכונת פורסט היל בטורונטו שבה חיה הקהילה היהודית הגדולה בקנדה, רוססו כתובות נאצה על סניף של ענקית הקפה סטארבקס. מייקל לויט, מנכ”ל ידידי מרכז השואה על שם שמעון ויזנטל, פרסם תמונות של האירוע ברשתות החברתיות. זאת למקרה שמישהו מתקשה לקרוא את גרפיטי השנאה. כתוב שם ספל קפה ובעצם אתם מתכוונים לספל דם. תפסיקו להרוג תינוקות ודם על ידיכם. זו המציאות היומיומית של יהודי קנדה
השחתת הסניף על רקע הטענה כי סטארבקס תומכת בישראל היא רק דוגמה אחת לאירועים הקשים שהפכו מנת חלקם של יהודי טורונטו וערים אחרות. באירוע אחר ריססו פעילים פרו־פלסטינים צבע אדום על חנות ספרים בטורונטו, ותלו עליה כרזות עם תמונת המנכ”לית הת’ר רייזמן בצירוף הכיתוב אתם מממנים רצח עם. באירועים במונטריאול אלמונים ירו לעבר בית כנסת ושני בתי ספר. את האירועים גינה בחריפות ראש ממשלת קנדה, ג’סטין טרודו. לדבריו אירועי האנטישמיות הנוראים במונטריאול חייבים להיפסק. אף הורה לא צריך להידרש לספר לילדו כי ירו על בית ספר. אף רב לא צריך להסביר לקהילה שבית הכנסת שלה הותקף. במונטריאול מתגוררת הקהילה היהודית השנייה בגודלה במדינה
בטורונטו דיווח גם על תלישת מזוזות, ריסוס גרפיטי של מגיני דוד טבולים בדם על בתים של יהודים ובבית ספר. בכיר במשטרת טורונטו אומר, כי הממוצע היומי של פשעי שנאה נגד יהודים קפץ בכמאה שלושים אחוז מאז פרוץ המלחמה. לפי גורמים רשמיים, אף שדווחו גם אירועים אסלאמופוביים, מספרם זעום בהשוואה לאלימות הגואה נגד יהודים. שיעור המוסלמים בקנדה הוא קרוב לחמישה אחוזים ומהגדולים במערב, לעומת כאחוז ליהודים
באוניברסיטת קונקורדיה מונטריאול מתגבשת תביעה ייצוגית נגד המוסד האקדמי ואגודת הסטודנטים בטענה כי טיפחו מרחב מוגן לאנטישמיות לאורך השנים, וגרמו בכך לפגיעה רגשית בקרב סטודנטים ומרצים. התביעה מבקשת פיצויים בסכום של חמישה עשר מיליון דולר (קנדי) עבור התובעים, שעמם נמנים סטודנטים, אנשי צוות ומרצים יהודים שהשתייכו למוסד האקדמי בשלוש השנים האחרונות. אוניברסיטת קונקורדיה כשלה בחקירה ובתגובה לאירועים אנטישמיים בתחומה, דבר שאיפשר לאנטישמיות לשגשג ברחבי הקמפוס, טענו העותרים. בבקשה תוארה תקרית אלימה בין סטודנטים פרו־ישראלים לפרו־פלסטינים שהסתיימה במעצר של סטודנט ופציעתם של סטודנט נוסף ואנשי ביטחון. התביעה נגד קונקורדיה מתגבשת ברקע מאבקן של אוניברסיטאות ברחבי קנדה להתמודד עם המציאות הנפיצה בקמפוסים, מאז פרוץ המלחמה ומצטרפת לתביעה שהגישו בשבוע שעבר סטודנטים באוניברסיטת ניו יורק שבה הושמעו טענות דומות
ההסלמה באירועים האלימים נגד יהודי קנדה מאז מתקפת חמאס איננה מאפיינת רק את הערים הגדולות ביותר. במיסיסאוגה במחוז אונטריו, העיר השביעית בגודלה בקנדה, רופא יהודי קיבל איומים על חייו. ביישוב קטן יותר באונטריו, בריונים תלו מכתב איום על בית משפחה יהודית. אין ספק שאנחנו עדים להסלמה חדה באנטישמיות בעיר שלנו, בערים ברחבי קנדה וברחבי העולם מאז מתקפת חמאס, מציין נח שאק, סגן נשיא למלחמה בפשעי שנאה ואנטישמיות, במרכז בטורונטו. בין שמדובר באירועי בריונות נגד הילדים שלנו בבתי ספר משום שהם יהודים ובין שנגד סטודנטים באוניברסיטאות, או אפילו נגד אנשים שעוצרים לקפה בדרך לעבודה ונחשפים לוונדליזם אנטישמי וכתובות שטנה. מדובר במציאות מטרידה מאוד, הוא ציין עוד
In 2002, when the once and future prime minister of Israel, Binyamin Netanyahu, visited Montreal, a violent riot by anti-Zionists erupted at Concordia University. That was a turning point in a now two-decades-long period of anti-Israel and, in some cases, anti-Jewish activism on Canadian campuses.
Universities across Canada would go on to host events such as Israel Apartheid Week and, on multiple campuses, countless peaceful and less peaceful attacks on Israel and its supporters have occurred. As all of this has transpired, Concordia has had the reputation of having probably the most anti-Zionist and antisemitic campus culture in the country. So, many Jews and other observers were stunned when the Concordia Student Union issued an apology to the Jewish community. Released the day before Yom Hashoah, the statement from the CSU began: “Today, we strive to acknowledge our mistakes and begin the process of correcting ourselves.”
The 500-word letter of apology was an unequivocal denunciation of past CSU actions and approaches.
“Overall, our mistakes can be described in one word, indifference,” it reads. “Indifference to one of the world’s oldest forms of discrimination. Indifference to the concerns of our Jewish students. Indifference to the struggles they have faced. While a common topic of our meetings has been how the CSU can tackle other forms of discrimination or support certain minority groups, the Jewish community and antisemitism are seldom brought up.… The CSU has assisted in fostering a campus culture where Jewish students are afraid to openly identify as Jewish…. Our silence on these issues only benefits the oppressors and sets the belief that these acts are somehow justifiable, which encourages the oppressors to continue this behaviour. This behaviour continues well outside the boundaries of our campus and into a society where they may harm many more individuals.”
In addition to the apology for past behaviours, the statement promises concrete action now and in the future. All elected student union officials will receive training on antisemitism every year. Executive members of all Concordia campus clubs will also receive annual training to identify antisemitism and help foster an environment where Jewish students and members of the community can feel safe and fully included. A bystander prevention program is being developed to help students “identify and safely intervene and/or support Jewish students if they witness an act of antisemitism.”
“While we stood idly by in the past while acts of antisemitism occurred, we hope not to repeat those mistakes again and hope the Jewish community will give us another chance to support them in the future,” the apology concludes.
The statement was issued after a process of listening to Jewish students express their fears and experiences with antisemitism at the university. It was drafted by Eduardo Malorni, currently the student life coordinator of the CSU, who will assume the role of general coordinator (the equivalent of union president) in June.
From top: Concordia Student Union councilors Eduardo Malorni, Nicole Nashen and Harrison Kirshner spoke to the Independent via Zoom about the CSU’s apology to Jewish students. (screenshots)
“We got feedback that it was very appreciated,” Malorni told the Independent. “Some people brought up that it was too little, too late, which is a fair criticism for an organization that’s been around as long as us. But our feedback all seems to be positive.”
Two Jewish campus leaders who also spoke with the Independent were emotional.
“I cried the first time I read it,” said Nicole Nashen, an elected CSU councilor and incoming president of Concordia Hillel.
“We cried together,” said Harrison Kirshner, a vice-president of Concordia Hillel, a CSU councilor and incoming executive member.
“As a student, when I first came to Concordia, I knew in my mind what type of institution this is and I knew that I had to hide part of myself in a sense,” said Kirshner. He would think twice, he said, before mentioning celebrating Jewish holidays, for example. Part of the progress that culminated in the apology, he suggested, was students like him opening up and sharing their experiences.
“I realize that conversation and speaking to people about what we face is a much better way than hiding it and not talking about it and not addressing those issues,” he said. “Because, if we don’t address them, nothing is going to change. But, if we do address and we do talk about the experiences that we face, change can stem from that. That’s what we are seeing happening.”
The campus climate is significantly better than he expected when he arrived.
“I noticed that people were receptive to those discussions, people that I thought maybe wouldn’t be receptive to those discussions were receptive to those discussions,” he said. “Part of the reason is because, instead of going in with a fighting attitude, we need to go in with a respectful attitude, a dialogue attitude, an attitude that allows us to open up a conversation with our fellow councilors who I consider to be allies, friends.”
Nashen also acknowledged a feeling in the pit of her stomach when fellow students would raise the topic of ethnicity.
“I didn’t know how I was going to be labeled or what the reaction was going to be or what assumptions are going to be made about me because of the fact that I’m Jewish,” she said. Elected to the CSU recently for the second time, she said she never foresaw being so welcomed.
Both Kirshner and Nashen credit Malorni, who is not Jewish, for encouraging them to share their stories and for making other Jewish students comfortable to come forward and share their experiences. The letter, they said, came from his heart.
“It did come from the heart,” Malorni admitted, “but it only came from the heart because Harrison and Nikki were so open about talking about the issues they faced and also in setting up meetings with other Jewish students who would never have come near the CSU with a 10-foot pole, setting up meetings and saying it’s safe, you can explain it to them, they’re not going to bite your hand off, because students would never have told us 95% of what they told us, unless those meetings were facilitated by both Harrison and Nikki. That’s why I think, in terms of writing the apology, when it came down to it, it became – I wouldn’t say it was easy to write it – but the words were a little easier to come from brain to paper.”
The letter, of course, comes from a new group of CSU leaders, not from the individuals who were involved before and perpetrated some of the extreme activities, such as a Passover Against Apartheid event a few years ago. The current crop of leaders was elected in a campus vote that saw extremely low turnout. However, Malorni noted, student union votes at Concordia and most universities are notoriously and chronically low, so the small number of voters who endorsed the current leaders is commensurate with the number who voted for the earlier, problematic representatives.
“The majority of messages that I’ve received are shock,” Nashen said. “I would have never imagined this could have ever happened at Concordia.… I think a lot of people, especially maybe people who went to Concordia and were involved in Concordia 10 to 20 years ago, but haven’t kept in the loop about CSU affairs, were just utterly shocked, could not believe it. Then, a lot of current students were reaching out to me saying, ‘I just had shivers reading this.’ I can’t believe that our issues are really being taken seriously and that the CSU really cares to help us fight antisemitism.”
She acknowledged that the apology is the beginning of a process, not the end.
“I don’t think this was a fix-all,” she said. “I think this was the first step that the CSU is taking toward telling the Jewish community that they do care about us now and they are ready to start listening to us and taking our issues seriously. What really put the cherry on top was not just words but it came along with actionable steps.”
Malorni said Concordia has had a national reputation as a tough campus for Jewish students, but he is well aware that other campuses have also had their experiences with conflict.
“While we had the worst reputation for it, it’s not something that doesn’t exist at the other universities,” he said. When the apology was posted, he said, commenters from all over North America recounted their own experiences with antisemitism at their universities.
“It’s not a thing limited to Concordia, despite our little extra bad reputation,” he said. “It’s something that seems to have crossed the bounds of our land.”
Prof. Ira Robinson of Concordia University’s Institute for Canadian Jewish Studies teaches a wide range of students about the Holocaust and antisemitism. (photo from Ira Robinson)
Ira Robinson is the director of Concordia University’s Institute for Canadian Jewish Studies and a professor of Judaic studies in the department of religions and cultures. A strong believer that an educator shouldn’t teach the same course in the same way year after year, he is always looking for new ways to reach students of all ages.
Born in Boston, Mass., Robinson moved to Montreal with his wife, Sandra, 40 years ago.
“I came to Canada because Concordia offered me a job, and I landed in the right place at the right time,” he told the Independent. “Academics don’t always have a complete choice of where they are going to settle. I came to Montreal and Montreal has a large and interesting Jewish community and a tremendously interesting bilingual culture.”
Though Robinson had never envisioned writing a book about antisemitism or the Holocaust, he did so, publishing A History of Antisemitism in Canada in 2015.
Robinson was trained by students of the late Salo Baron, a Polish-American historian, who once said, “If you want to understand the totality of Jewish history, you have to take into consideration that the pogroms and the massacres take only an infinitesimal amount of time, even though they wreak great havoc.”
According to Robinson, “Ninety-nine percent of the time, we’re dealing with normal life…. Baron and his students decided to look at the Jews as they had lived and not as they had died. That was the lesson that I took.”
For Robinson, this meant he would have to determine his own take on the history of antisemitism in Canada and, hence, “I came out with the book.”
Robinson starts many of his courses by telling students that there is nothing he is going to teach them that is not completely denied by somebody, somewhere. With this message, he is stressing that what he is about to teach is his perspective on what took place.
In looking at the history of antisemitism in Canada, for example, Robinson tried to contextualize the reasons Jews were looked at as guests in the 1920 and 1930s in Canada.
“What I did in this book is create a continuous narrative on antisemitism in Canada from the 18th century through to the present,” he explained. “There have been many very good studies on various aspects of antisemitism in Canada, the most famous of which is [Irving] Abella’s and [Harold] Troper’s None is Too Many. This academic book uniquely made a difference in the political discourse of Canada. Now, whenever anyone debates a refugee issue in Canada, the phrase, ‘None is too many,’ is sure to come into the discourse or debate at some point. That was a great success, but the book only concentrates on the 1920s to the 1940s, and mainly focuses on the Canadian federal government.”
Since the research for Robinson’s book was completed in 2014, antisemitism has increased, he said. For that reason, he decided to find ways to teach about the problem to younger children, kids in grades 4 to 6.
“It presents a challenge, because I have to begin with who they [antisemites] are and where they are,” said Robinson. “And so, I started by talking with them [the kids] about bullying, because bullying, as you understand, is something that kids know about and people talk to them about it.
“If you see somebody bullying somebody else, what are you supposed to do? If you can intervene, you should intervene. If you need to call somebody in a position of authority, you call somebody…. So, I said, ‘imagine that there are kids and you can bully them and nobody is going to stop you. And imagine that, if somebody goes to a person of authority, they will just say, ‘Good for you!’”
Robinson took it a step further, creating a PowerPoint presentation focusing on the wearing of the yellow Jewish star that was imposed upon Jews.
“I showed first a picture of a girl’s dress with the yellow star shown on it – just the dress, nobody in it,” he said. “Then, the next thing I showed was a little girl in a dress with the yellow star. When I changed the slide from just the girl’s dress with the yellow star to the little girl in the dress with a yellow star, I could hear a slight gasp among the students. So, there are ways – you have to talk to the people you have in front of you.”
Robinson gave this presentation in a public school and, as far he knows, there were no Jewish students in the classroom. “I am used to talking to a wide range of people,” he said. “And, in my university classes, for instance, I do expect Jews to enrol, and they do. But, I also expect Muslims and Christians to enrol, and they do, and everybody else, too.”
In Robinson’s view, the challenge of finding ways to disseminate the information effectively is always a worthwhile exercise.
“There are lots of people involved in Holocaust education and I think a lot of them are spending a lot of effort introducing and assisting in educating about the Holocaust in public school systems. The problem, as always, is not lack of good will,” he said, “but that the schools are under great pressure from a whole bunch of different directions. What should our children study? And the mega trend, not merely in public schools, but also in universities, is moving away from the social sciences and humanities, and focusing on other subjects.”
As far as teaching methods regarding the Holocaust and antisemitism, Robinson said, “I think I am able to speak with more depth, because you can’t teach the same course in the same way for decades. You have to develop a scholarly understanding as the field develops and, so, my teaching is informed by my reading and my reading continues to inform me.
“And my power is that I am able to direct students to certain books, certain articles and certain films that I think will help them develop their sense of things. But, before I can even do that, before I can guide anybody, I have to find the things myself, first and foremost.”
