The Western Jewish Bulletin about uscontact ussearch
Shalom Dancers Dome of the Rock Street in Israel Graffiti Jewish Community Center Kids Wailing Wall
Serving British Columbia Since 1930
homethis week's storiesarchivescommunity calendarsubscribe
 


home > this week's story

 

special online features
faq
about judaism
business & community directory
vancouver tourism tips
links

Sign up for our e-mail newsletter. Enter your e-mail address here:



Search the Jewish Independent:


 

 

archives

September 21, 2001

Opinion - CJC attacks Durban conference

UN cannot stop racism (Opinion)
CJC president lambastes the conference in Durban.

KEITH LANDY SPECIAL TO THE JEWISH BULLETIN

The United Nations World Conference Against Racism, earlier this month in Durban, South Africa, showed both the prevalence of racism worldwide and the utter inability of this compromised and corrupted forum to combat it.

The United Nations is a body of states with one vote for each state. When states have something in common, such as religion or ethnic origin, they can band together for common purposes and form very effective voting blocs.

There were some 168 member states attending the conference. In the UN, more than 20 are in the Arab League, 55 in the Organization of Islamic States and about 120 are "non-aligned" states, most of which support the Arab League in its approach. Israel is the only Jewish state and is the UN sanctioned expression of the self-determination of the Jewish people. In any conflict involving Arab states, it is in an automatic minority in this forum.

The racism conference was hi-jacked by those states and groups that wished to promote an anti-Israel and anti-Jewish agenda. They were not there to fight global racism but simply to have Israel condemned above all other nations on earth.

What is astonishing is that the United Nations and the international community allowed them to get away with it.

First, Iran prevented official Jewish and other minority delegates from participating in the Asian regional preparatory conference held in Tehran, so that no opposing views were heard or registered. Second, the preparatory conference report contained odious anti-Jewish references minimizing the Holocaust and diluting the meaning of anti-Semitism, as well as extremely inflammatory language attacking Israel, despite agreements that no preparatory conference report would condemn specific states.

Third, Mary Robinson, UN high commissioner on human rights, participated in the preparatory conference and sanctioned its report, even after she knew what it contained.

Fourth, the Arab League threatened to withdraw if the language was changed or eliminated. Other countries and NGOs with a large stake in other issues for the world conference were reluctant to see their work undermined just over one issue, so they seldom challenged the Arab preoccupation with Israel.

Jewish groups were vilified and shouted down; their questions were ruled out of order or they were not allowed to speak; the section submitted by the commission on anti-Semitism was removed from the final document so that only the Jews at the conference were given no voice. This was the final act which pushed the Jewish caucus to walk out.

Openly anti-Jewish propaganda was distributed at the race conference site, including the Protocols of the Elders of Zion and anti-Semitic T-shirts and cartoon caricatures. It was these caricatures that prompted Robinson to express her horror and disgust at the Jew-hatred being openly promulgated at the conference. Major NGOs have refused to subscribe to the final NGO declaration. The anti-Jewish language of the final NGO forum was so extreme that Robinson refused to recommend it for consideration by states at the formal UN World Conference, thus throwing all the other work in the document into question.

The United States and Israel walked out of the conference when it was obvious such language had a serious chance to be included in the final declaration. Delegates had already distinguished themselves by promoting hatred against Jews. The Iranian delegate claimed anti-Semitism did not exist because it was not a contemporary form of racism; the Syrian delegate, the representative of a country now almost certain to be on the Security Council, claimed that the Holocaust was a Jewish lie. Yasser Arafat claimed Israel was based on a "supremacist" mentality, a sly reference to anti-Semitic stereotypes of Jews, rightly condemned by Canada's Secretary of State Hedy Fry.

To show their true commitment to combat racism, Arab delegates were apparently ready to remove references to Israel only if references to anti Semitism and the Holocaust were also removed. Apparently Palestinian rights are negotiable as long as the Jews are given a blow.

The tortured final document, though less extreme, is still dangerous to peace in the Middle East, an issue that had no place at this forum. It's difficult to see how this debased conference has done anything but divide people who otherwise work together to combat racism.

Keith Landy is national president of the Canadian Jewish Congress and was a delegate to the Durban NGO forum.

^TOP