|
|
October 31, 2003
Malaysian PM correct?
Editorial
While many were recoiling from the mythological anti-Semitism of
Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad, a local newspaper came
to his defence, saying the criticism of Mahathir "plays into
the hands of people who want to dampen criticism of Israel's right-wing
government."
The Asian Pacific Post, an English-language biweekly aimed
at the diverse south- and east-Asian communities in the Lower Mainland,
said Mahathir's comments were taken out of context and that criticism
of the statements raises risks of ending free speech.
"This, if left unchecked," stated an unsigned editorial
in the Oct. 23-Nov. 5 edition, "will lead to accusations of
anti-Semitism becoming so common that many will be unable to distinguish
between dissent and hate."
Too late. The Post editorial writer has exhibited a breathtaking
inability to do just that.
Let's assume, for the sake of argument, that charges of anti-Semitism
are used too often to stifle criticism of Israel. Mahathir made
only vague references to Israel. His ad hominem attack was aimed
at Jews, not Israel. He did not suggest that Israel controls the
world, but declared that Jews do. He did not suggest Muslims need
to conclude a "final victory" over Israel, he demanded
final victory over "the Jews." He did not claim that Israel
gets non-Jews to fight and die on its behalf, this astonishing assertion
was attributed to Jews.
"Being critical of Israeli policies does not make one anti-Semitic,"
concluded the Post editorial. Of course it doesn't. If it
did, half or more of Israeli voters would fall into that category.
But criticism of Israel was only incidental to Mahathir's diatribe.
His target was Jews.
As for the remarks being taken out of context, as the editorial
asserted, extracting a few paragraphs does not perforce equal
decontextualization. The comments stand alone and no amount of context
could alter their prejudiced foundations nor their hateful intent.
Mahathir's comments were as extreme in their anti-Semitism as any
words spoken. There may be times when anti-Semitism is too strong
an accusation. This is not one of them. The Post and its
publishers should be ashamed.
^TOP
|
|