The Western Jewish Bulletin about uscontact ussearch
Shalom Dancers Dome of the Rock Street in Israel Graffiti Jewish Community Center Kids Wailing Wall
Serving British Columbia Since 1930
homethis week's storiesarchivescommunity calendarsubscribe
 


home > this week's story

 

special online features
faq
about judaism
business & community directory
vancouver tourism tips
links

Sign up for our e-mail newsletter. Enter your e-mail address here:



Search the Jewish Independent:


 

 

archives

October 18, 2002

Rabbi brings a ray of hope

MK seeks unity of the left, right, religious and secular.
PAT JOHNSON REPORTER

After peace and oil, the commodity Israel may lack most is optimism. However, a rabbi who was in Vancouver last week is an articulate new voice for moderation in Israel's parliament and offers a vision that is striking for its bright outlook.

Rabbi Yehuda Gilad became a member of the Knesset just four months ago as a midterm replacement for another MK who resigned. Gilad became just the second member of his Meimad party in the Knesset (deputy foreign minister Rabbi Michael Melchior is the first), but he hopes to create a movement that alters the way Israelis view themselves and their region.

Meimad was founded in 1988 and first elected a representative in 1999, seeking a middle ground between the often irreconcilable secular and religious segments of Israeli society. Gilad, who is a rabbi in the religious kibbutz movement, said the traditional religious parties have moved to the extreme right both religiously and politically and no longer offer a platform that is palatable to the majority of Israelis who are not religious. He describes Meimad, which is part of the One Israel coalition government, as a religious party, but carefully explains the differences between his vision and that of others, such as the National Religious party. As an observant, Orthodox Jew, Gilad believes the Sabbath should be a day of rest and reflection; a time when the ordinary processes of the material world are suspended. But he also recognizes that there is a sizeable number of Israelis who do not share his level of commitment to Torah. His approach on this issue is emblematic of his party's compromising nature on a range of fronts. Meimad would like to see strictly commercial establishments remain closed on Shabbat, but would allow entertainment venues, such as theatres, to open for the enjoyment of those who would choose to see a film on the Sabbath.

He says the religious parties have exerted so much control in Israeli society over the last few years that their efforts have had the opposite of the intended consequences. By imposing an Orthodox approach to issues such as Shabbat closures, civil marriages and conversions, Gilad said, the traditional religious parties and their supporters have alienated the people they intended to persuade. Observance should be the result of personal choice, the rabbi said, and not done out of coercion.

Gilad's political philosophy is based on the difficult balance that has always faced Israel: being a democratic state while preserving the unique Jewish nature on which it was founded. Gilad refuses to see the two as mutually exclusive and indeed has strong opinions about those who suggest it must be one or the other.

There is no contradiction, he said, insisting that Israel can exist as a democratic, Jewish state. He wants to see more Judaism in Israel, but less coercion. It is the responsibility of the religious in Israel to encourage observance and mutual respect through moral suasion and exemplary behavior, rather than through political power and the force of law. Jewish learning should be increased in public schools, for instance, but then students should be left to make their own choices about the degree of their religious expression.

As a Torah scholar, Gilad said he accepts the view of the Charedi parties that the so-called occupied territories are part of a divinely ordained greater Israel. But he said it is important to recognize the difference between messianic visions and earthly realities. Two peoples cannot exclusively control one land, he said, and the need for peace must supercede some theological assertions.

In practical terms, this means Israel and the Palestinians must compromise to some degree. He would be willing to see Israel give up about 90 per cent of the territories, maintaining control over settlements that could be contiguously integrated into the Jewish state. At the same time, the Palestinians would need to explicitly recognize Israel, something that even Gilad acknowledged probably won't happen until there is a change in the Palestinian leadership.

Although Meimad's two MKs are part of the coalition government, they remain a distinctly small voice of moderation and compromise. At the same time, they are far from mere voices in the wilderness. Melchior and Gilad were among the signatories of a manifesto that has made some significant ripples in the Israeli body politic. The Kineret Declaration is a document endorsed by a diverse range of Israeli leaders from the secular and religious communities, the political left and right. It is a confirmation of what are traditionally Zionist principles, but offers a rededication to the unity of Israel as both a democratic and a Jewish state, a proposition that has been increasingly regarded as naive and unworkable by many Israelis.

Emphasizing cultural, rather than political, aspects of nationalism, the declaration states that the Jewish nature of Israel is expressed "in a profound commitment to Jewish history and Jewish culture; in the state's connection to the Jews of the Diaspora, the Law of Return, and its efforts to encourage aliyah and absorption; in the Hebrew language, the principal language of the state, and the unique language of a unique Israeli creativity; in the festivals and official days of rest of the state, its symbols and its anthem; in Hebrew culture with its Jewish roots, and in the state institutions devoted to its advancement; and in the Jewish educational system, whose purpose is to inculcate, along with general and scientific knowledge and the values of humanity and along with loyalty to the state and love of the land of Israel and its vistas, the student's attachment to the Jewish people, the Jewish heritage and the book of books."

Not unexpectedly, the declaration brought condemnation from both sides of the social divide, being attacked by secularists and religious alike. (In this, the authors have already succeeded, if unwittingly, in an act of unification.) Still, Gilad said he has been warmly welcomed in the Knesset by leaders on both the right and the left, the secular and the religious. He remains optimistic that Meimad's view of a unified Israel can be created through communication and compromise.

Gilad's sense of compromise is evident in everything he does. As the spiritual head of Yeshivat Ma'ale Gilboa, on a kibbutz 90 minutes north of Jerusalem, he presides over a religious institution whose students are both dedicated Torah scholars and members of the Israel Defence Forces. Unlike some scholars who view national military service as a distraction from Torah, Gilad, a former combat soldier and army chaplain, views the IDF as one of the most unifying forces in Israeli society.

Gilad's visit to Vancouver was part of a larger North American mission on behalf of Gilad's yeshivah as well as an opportunity to tell Diaspora audiences about his vision of Israeli politics. In addition to the West Coast, Gilad visited Toronto, Boston and New York. While here, he gave classes at Shaarey Tefilah Synagogue, including an address on maintaining morality in times of crisis.

^TOP