
|
|

Nov. 18, 2005
Seeking R-E-S-P-E-C-T
Editorial
We are in the midst of election fever. Voters around British Columbia
vote tomorrow, Nov. 19, for mayors, city councillors, school trustees
and, in Vancouver, park commissioners. This year has also seen a
provincial election and now it appears that we are weeks away from
a federal election. For a Jewish newspaper – and for the Jewish
community more broadly – these elections have presented interesting
opportunities and particular challenges. Two questions come to mind
each time we face another election: What is a Jewish issue? And
what do Jewish voters want?
A Jewish issue, we surmise, is any issue in which a Jewish British
Columbian takes an interest. Recently, community leaders gathered
to discuss poverty, which is widely accepted within the Jewish communal
structure to be a "Jewish issue" because poverty affects
Jews. Likewise, housing is a Jewish issue because the price and
availability of residential accommodation in the Lower Mainland
has dramatic impacts on the Jewish community, which has been forced
into a diffused demographic, as younger generations, seeking (often
barely) affordable homes, have moved further and further from what
was once the locus of Jewish Vancouver.
Some more obvious, traditional "Jewish issues" are certain
to come up during a federal election. The federal government, which
determines immigration levels, foreign policy and sanctions against
hate-motivated crime, is a natural nexus of Jewish and general concerns.
But, even at the federal level, though there are a number of hot
potato issues important to Jewish Canadians, the majority of Jews
will probably make their choice based on the same variety of issues
other Canadians use to measure candidates: perceived honesty and
fitness to govern, taxes, the economy, social policies and so forth.
Institutionalized anti-Semitism in Canadian government policy is
a thing of the past. Anti-Jewish sentiment and incidents occur in
Canada, but they do so in spite of, not because of, government initiatives.
The main "Jewish issue," it could be said, is preventing
any backsliding from this assurance of acceptance – and such
backsliding into institutional anti-Semitism, while possible, does
not appear likely in Canada's near-term.
So what, then, can a politician do to gain the support of the Jewish
community? In a word: nothing. There is no single policy or panacea
that will ensure strong support from Canadian Jews for a particular
candidate or party. There is, however, a way to lose the Jewish
community's support.
Because constitutional and other bulwarks are in place to protect
Jews and other minorities from the basest prejudice and bigotry,
there remain few community-specific "demands" we might
ask of political candidates. What is left to guide us tends to be
a more ethereal measure. It is, as Aretha Franklin, the Gaon of
Motown, described it: R-E-S-P-E-C-T.
Respect cannot be measured. Nor can it be tangibly identified. A
candidate may say the right things to appeal to minority voters,
but harbor various forms of prejudice or lack of respect under their
veneer of egalitarianism. Jewish and other minority voters are sometimes
capable of sensing sincerity. Other times, it is not so easy. But
there are measures that some Jewish voters will use tomorrow and
when the federal vote comes.
Immigration policy has always been a central concern for Jewish
voters. Those who have memories of Jewish refugees being turned
away from these shores understand the sometimes life-and-death implications
of immigration policy. We also know that openness to immigration
is often accompanied by an openness to differentness, to multiculturalism,
and an opposition to immigration can – though does not necessarily
– accompany or presage intolerance to minorities.
In recent years, foreign policy has become a central concern to
Jewish voters, many of whom have felt isolated and vilified as Israel
has been isolated and vilified, in Canada and worldwide. Part of
the respect that Jewish voters can rightly demand is that candidates
learn to appreciate the centrality of Israel to the Jewish psyche
and body politic. Failure to understand this Israel-Diaspora relationship
is arguably the most gaping hole into which a politician can stumble.
And respect means understanding why Jewish Vancouverites might be
concerned about the planned World Peace Forum, scheduled to coincide
with next year's Habitat conference here. Using the word "peace"
as an inoculation, some proponents contend there is no reason for
fear, despite that the event is likely to attract many of the activists
who have been foremost in the anti-Israel dogpile of recent years.
Respect is not an easy thing to measure. But we know it when we
see it.
^TOP
|
|