
|
|

November 19, 2004
Mideast Groundhog Day
Editorial
Not since the resumption of Palestinian violence in 2000 and arguably
not since 1948 have Israelis and Palestinians stood at a moment
as portentous as the next 60 days.
The promise of Palestinian elections to replace the late Yasser
Arafat will determine whether peaceful coexistence is a tangible
possibility or as remote as ever.
There is a danger in raising hopes too high. Israelis did that after
1993 and so were blindsided in 2000. Moreover, we would be foolish
to think that Arafat was the only thing standing between Israel
and peace. Arafat presided over a society that he constructed in
his own image: corrupt, autocratic, violent, volatile, unpredictable
and steeped in crude ideological anti-Semitism. His legacy will
haunt us and the Palestinian people for a generation or more.
At the same time, developments do offer an unprecedented opportunity.
Though Arafat was not the only thing standing between Israel and
peace, he was the first thing.
Even so, many questions remain. Will elections even take place?
Will the violent extremists of Hamas and the al-Aqsa Martyrs and
others participate or obstruct? Will (perceived) moderates be victorious
or will they be sidelined by extremists or assassinations (which
may have been the intent of Sunday's violence during Mahmoud Abbas's
visit to the official mourning site in Gaza)? And how will Israeli
actions or inaction influence the process?
Pro-Palestinian commentators are asserting that Israel will now
be forced to address the Palestinians' legitimate demands, since
they can no longer couch their refusal to negotiate in anti-Arafat
excuses. They're correct. Just as the future amenability of the
Palestinians will become evident in the next 60 days, so will that
of the Israelis. But while these critics have insisted that the
Israeli refusal to deal with Arafat was an excuse to ignore Palestinian
demands in general, the next weeks will show the opposite: that
Israel has been waiting for just such a moment, to show that, as
with Anwar Sadat, given a willing partner for peace, Israel is willing
to offer massive compromises. Unless, of course, the Palestinians
offer up an uncompromising extremist (or if the election process
fails).
In a perverse twist on Groundhog Day, we should know by early January
whether Israel will face a springtime of hope and peace or a further
elongation of this miserable four-year winter of violence.
^TOP
|
|