|
|
November 29, 2002
UN and Israel: A Joke!
On America Online, there is a feature called Judaism Today:
Where Do I Fit? People anonymously send e-mails to the author of
the feature, Gil Mann, and he selects one letter for a public response
in his e-mail column. Earlier this year, in a column about Israel,
Mann wrote that the United Nations was "disgustingly anti-Israel."
Hello Gil:
Let's try to be objective when calling the United Nations disgustingly
anti-Israel, there are positions that some consider to be neutral,
they just sound a little different than the garbage that George
Bush spews. Israel can be criticized, like any other nation.
L.
Dear L:
Imagine the following fictitious scenario:
On the border between North and South Korea sit neutral UN peacekeeping
soldiers. North Korean troops are on their side of the border and
American troops protect the South Korean border. One day, U.S. soldiers
patrolling the South Korean border encounter a UN vehicle on the
South Korean side of the border. When the Americans approach, they
are ambushed by North Koreans who have crossed into South Korea
... blatant violations of international law. Three U.S. soldiers
are shot and their bodies dragged away into North Korea.
Nine months later, the United States learns that "somehow"
UN "peacekeeping" soldiers on the border had videotaped
the ambush. Further, the UN had the video and was concealing this
fact. Once the existence of the video is discovered, the UN refuses
to let the United States see the tape.
Something like this couldn't happen at the UN, right? Think again.
This is what happened, including the video, beginning on Oct. 7,
2000. The border was not Korea, but Lebanon. The soldiers ambushed
(and later declared killed) on the Israeli side of the border were
Israeli. The ambushers who crossed the border were Lebanese-based
Hezbollah soldiers. The UN was ... well, the UN.
When it comes to Israel, the track record of the UN is exactly as
I wrote in my prior column: disgustingly biased against Israel!
Did you know that, until recently, Israel was the only country out
of 189 member countries that was prohibited from serving on the
Security Council (currently chaired by Syria).
How about the UN resolution in 1975 equating Zionism with racism?
In 1991, under intense U.S. pressure, the UN finally repealed the
resolution, but the damage was done. Over the last decades, misinformation
about Zionism has been widespread.
The anti-Israel voting records of the General Assembly and Security
Council leave the impression that Israel is one of the only countries
on the planet. Of the 175 United Nations Security Council resolutions
passed before 1990, 97 were directed against Israel. Of the 690
General Assembly resolutions voted on before 1990, 429 were directed
against Israel.
Bias goes beyond those two UN bodies. The UN Commission on Human
Rights has devoted 25 per cent of their condemnations to Israel.
Yet, as noted by David Tell in "The UN's Israel obsession"
(www.weeklystandard.com): "There has been a genocide in Rwanda,
an ethnic cleansing in Yugoslavia, periodic and horrifying communal
'strife' in Indonesia's East Timor, the 'disappearance' of a few
hundred thousand refugees in the Congo, a decades-long and culturally
devastating occupation of Tibet by the People's Republic of China
... but none of those UN member states has ever been subjected to
the rebuke of a General Assembly 'emergency special session.' "
The UN Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) has existed for more than
50 years, spending millions to administer humanitarian services
in Palestinians refugee camps. Critics like Irwin Cotler, member
of the Canadian Parliament, and U.S. congressman Tom Lantos ask
how, in UNRWA schools, do suicide bombers become glorified poster
boys? Or how do camps like Jenin (home to 23 suicide bombers) that
are serviced by UNRWA become hornets nests of terrorist activity?
How about when UNRWA commissioner Peter Hansen lied to the world's
media, claiming that Israel committed a "massacre" in
Jenin and that with his own eyes he saw bodies piling up in mass
graves? Months later, his quotes were totally discredited.
There are so many other examples of the UN's anti-Israel bias I
could give. So, while I agree that "Israel can be criticized
like any other nation," given the pathetic track record of
the United Nations, any critique of Israel coming from that biased
body is a sad joke with no credibility.
Gil
Gil Mann is the author of How to Get More Out of Being
Jewish. He welcomes your comments at [email protected].
^TOP
|
|