The Jewish Independent about uscontact ussearch
Shalom Dancers Dome of the Rock Street in Israel Graffiti Jewish Community Center Kids Wailing Wall
Serving British Columbia Since 1930
homethis week's storiesarchivescommunity calendarsubscribe
 


home > this week's story

 

special online features
faq
about judaism
business & community directory
vancouver tourism tips
links

Search the Jewish Independent:


 

 

archives

May 18, 2007

It all started with Abraham

Diversity panel discusses God, martyrdom and the future.
CYNTHIA RAMSAY

In this day and age, with the "war" that's being waged against terrorism and speculation about an imminent "clash of civilizations," it is encouraging to hear people engaging in dialogue. Or, in the case of the Abrahamic faiths, trialogue.

On May 6, Rabbi Reuven Bulka of Congregation Machzikei Hadas in Ottawa, Rev. Karen Hamilton, secretary general of the Canadian Council of Churches in Toronto, and Imam Abdul Hai Patel, co-ordinator of Islamic Council of Imams-Canada in Toronto, came together at the University of British Columbia for an interfaith panel discussion. Hosted by the Canadian Centre for Diversity, the two-hour trialogue was moderated by UBC Prof. Graeme Chalmers and focused on the basics of each religion, discussion about the concept of pluralism and what we can do to make the world a better place.

All of the panellists have been engaged in interfaith work for many years. Patel joked that he is called "Mr. Interfaith" by his friends at Canadian Jewish Congress because he's "been more in synagogues, temples and cathedrals than in mosques."

"The CJC, way before 9/11, approached us saying we cannot solve the problems of the Middle East here in Canada, but, as Canadians, why can we not sit down and talk?" explained Patel. "Why can we not work together on issues affecting us together, our faith, our community, or any other policy for that matter? And we began our dialogue."

One of the obvious impediments to dialogue, of course, is those people who feel that their religion, and their way of practising it, is the only way to access God.

"I would really like to get out of the language of who is right, because it's a major problem," said Bulka. "For example, I will just give you an interesting insight of Maimonides, because Maimonides was asked to make a comment on the Jewish attitude to Christianity.... Maimonides was a very devout Jew, but he saw Christianity as a very open force in the world.... Maimonides is saying Judaism is right for the Jews, and Christianity is right for the non-Jews. He didn't get into Islam at that point in timet.... That's the model that goes back generations and I think that it's critical for us to have that deep down in our gut, not just to say it publicly, but to really believe it, because ... people will feel this in the way that we interact with each other."

All of the panellists noted that, while there is diversity between Judaism, Christianity and Islam, there are also struggles within each religion. Patel pointed out that there are Sunnis and Shiites, and Muslims from all over the world come to Canada, "so we are also grappling with the differences within our own practices in the community," he said. "That someone will say, 'No, this is wrong' and the other will say, 'No, we've been doing this for years and it is part of our life, part of our faith,' and we get into the arguments of pronouncing each other not Muslim to the extent [that] 'You are not Muslim if you don't do this.'

"I always say here that these differences are there as a blessing to make us understand the fundamentals of Islam remain the same," he continued, "and if we can work around the basic fundamentals, then that is a lesson that we can teach others, as well as Canadians. No matter what faith we practise, no matter whether we are without faith, but if we need [to], we can work together on issues affecting our country, affecting our community, affecting the safety of this country.... But ignorance and narrow-mindedness have always prevailed, and that is why the acts of a few Muslims are what Muslims are judged by nowadays. And especially post-9/11 era. Everyone connecting terrorism in the name of Islam - that is their understanding, their interpretation; that is not the interpretation of Islam, not the interpretation of the majority."

Patel then cited a koranic statement, one that echoes the view of Christianity and Judaism, that "if you are to kill one human being innocently, it is as if you have killed the whole of humanity; if you save one human being, it is as if you have saved the whole of humanity."

Hamilton was optimistic that there were few truly intransigent people. It is amazing what kind of transformation can come through dialogue and relationship, she said. "We're in dialogue with those that don't believe in dialogue, for the long term, and we've got to be sustained by that and [it is] sustaining."

One of the ways in which followers of different religions can find common ground is through common concerns, such as low-income housing and other social justice issues. This was a notion repeated by the panellists during the discussion, as was how much the Abrahamic faiths have in common with each other, beginning with the fact that the same God is central to them all. The panellists also agreed on their distaste for the word "tolerance."

"Tolerance is a crummy word, because it's not the opposite of intolerance, it's the step before intolerance," said Bulka, adding that he prefers the word "acceptance."

And all three faiths are supposed to embrace diversity, according to the panellists.

"What we are and what we do reflects the idea that it's very important, at least within my faith, and I'm sure with the others, to be in the community and be concerned about the totality of the community," said Bulka. "That's the way rabbis are measured; not so much by what they do inside, but also how far they go outside the community."

Hamilton noted that "it is the biblical imperative and the faith imperative to ... respect and to understand that God is the God of all people and all creations. Christians, like everybody else, are human and fallible and they don't necessarily get it right sometimes."

Patel added: "Islam accepts diversity and it is the individuals that really make it difficult to accept, because the problem here, that people have to understand in Canada, is that some of the Muslims have come from completely homogeneous Muslim communities. They have not seen or heard of other faiths, so when coming into this country over here, and seeing a number of other faiths, they feel threatened, their values being threatened. And that's why there's a bit of intolerance.... This is the feeling of some of the communities, but that is not the case [with most]."

Martyrdom has a legitimate place in Islam, said Patel, "but that is if martyrdom is achieved, it's not asked for. You don't go and seek martyrdom.... If someone dies of cancer, any fatal disease or illness, [they are] also considered a martyr. Someone who dies ... in a state of fasting during the month of Ramadan is also considered a martyr. There are various levels ... of piety that bring people into this category, not just getting killed in a battlefield. So, martyrdom has different levels and it's only achieved unexpectedly; not that you are asking for or going after it."

Bulka said that the concept was similar in Judaism: "If a person sticks his neck out and says, 'Make me into a martyr,' that's not being a martyr. It's not something that you can will, but something which, unfortunately, is thrust upon you and [it's] the way that you react to it."

"Christianity does have a very small tradition of martyrdom," added Hamilton, giving the examples of Christians under Roman rule, when they refused to call Caesar God, and Christians who went to death in the death camps of the Second World War in the place of another.

Hamilton stressed that there were no quick fixes to the divisions between faiths, saying that we need to be in it, in dialogue, for the long term. And, she said, when the conversation gets tough - stay at the table.

Bulka recommended that people regularly ask themselves, "What have I done for somebody today outside my immediate matrix, my immediate family? Have I given blood? Have I given charity? Have I espoused a cause that's not my own? Have I gone beyond the boundary of my own inner sanctum into helping others? Because the idea of diversity is not just religious diversity, it's ethnic diversity, it's social diversity, there's all sorts of diversity. If I see someone that's a different color than me on the street, do I say hello to them? Do I go out of my way to be friendly to people that I don't even know?... These little things make a big difference."

He concluded: "Don't underestimate yourself. Don't underestimate the power of good deeds. They are powerful."

^TOP