The Jewish Independent about uscontact ussearch
Shalom Dancers Dome of the Rock Street in Israel Graffiti Jewish Community Center Kids Wailing Wall
Serving British Columbia Since 1930
homethis week's storiesarchivescommunity calendarsubscribe
 


home > this week's story

 

special online features
faq
about judaism
business & community directory
vancouver tourism tips
links

Search the Jewish Independent:


 

 

archives

March 9, 2007

Canada leads the way

We set an example at the UN, says activist.
REBECA KUROPATWA

The executive director of Geneva-based United Nations Human Rights Watch was recently in Winnipeg, speaking about the UN's new Human Rights Council, Israel and Canada, to an audience at the Asper Jewish Community Centre.

The UN has been touting the council as one that represents a great new chance for the world to set the struggle for human rights along a positive path.

But Hillel Neuer said that human rights in the UN are under assault at every turn. "The council in Geneva and the General Assembly in New York are increasingly forming alliances with oppressive regimes," he said. "This doesn't only stand in the way of reform, it also undermines the few meaningful mechanisms of UN human rights protection that already exist."

Human rights at the council are under assault for several reasons, explained Neuer. "Almost half of the new council are non-democracy members. According to Freedom House [which does an annual survey of freedom in the world], at least 47 per cent of the council members fail to meet the basic democratic standards - countries like China, Algeria, Pakistan, Cuba, Russia and Saudi Arabia. At the UN, if these regimes do not want to speak out against human rights abuses in their own countries, you can be sure that the same goes internationally."

In terms of how people regard the UN Human Rights Council, there are extremist positions on both sides, said Neuer: "This is especially true in the United States. One extremist position is that it is worthless and can accomplish nothing, because of the other countries that are there and the problems that exist. The other extreme view is international jingoism that says there are no problems at all at the UN. Both extreme views are false. There are problems that we need to make better, and we need to have a new approach. The Canadian approach is the one that all of us should adopt. That is, we should have a pragmatic approach."

Extremist views get you nowhere, Neuer continued. "The council exists for a reason, and it is the most influential body now in existence," he said. "As things stand, about half of the UN members are non-democratic. Therefore, the UN body can never really seriously address human rights violations. The myth that the 'spoilers have it' when it comes to the council is true. A good example of this is the Danish anti-Semitic cartoon controversy. The council is not impartial or effective now. But if it can be improved, it can be very effective. There is hope."

Some say that the council never agrees on country-specific situations. "I think everyone knows that is certainly not the case regarding one country," said Neuer. "There is a special agenda just for Israel. The General Assembly voted for a resolution that was passed that said you should not cite any countries for abuses. Yet Israel is cited for abuses regularly."

Neuer commended Canada for its leadership on Darfur. "But, unfortunately, the resolution that resulted was very weak," he said. "It was negotiated with Sudan, so that Sudan was celebrated for its co-operation. But, outside of this, resolutions have been those against Israel, with nothing said about Hamas or Hezbollah terrorism. This shows its politically motivated bias."

Despite all of this, Neuer maintained that we should not give up on the council. "We just have to be honest about what the problems are," he said. "The council is the foremost human rights, intellectualized body, and it is not going away. This is not to say that it is the most authoritative, from an objective point of view, but we can work to improve that."

At the council, Canada has stood in a class all its own, according to Neuer. "Canada is at the forefront in supporting every positive motion, both in the Human Rights Council and in the General Assembly," he said. "It also consistently abstains or votes against biased and malicious motions. Overall, it leads in standing up for what is right, and for speaking out against what is wrong. It should, though, speak out more in debates, especially about North Korea, China, Cuba, Saudi Arabia and Belarus.

"Canada needs to seize the imperative and the opportunity, speaking out on more issues, more vigorously. It can marshal the considerable respect it enjoys in the U.S. and Europe. With united initiative, conviction and energy, we [can] make sure that the world's human rights body lives up to their cause."

Rebeca Kuropatwa is a Winnipeg freelance writer.

^TOP