The Western Jewish Bulletin about uscontact ussearch
Shalom Dancers Dome of the Rock Street in Israel Graffiti Jewish Community Center Kids Wailing Wall
Serving British Columbia Since 1930
homethis week's storiesarchivescommunity calendarsubscribe
 


home > this week's story

 

special online features
faq
about judaism
business & community directory
vancouver tourism tips
links

Sign up for our e-mail newsletter. Enter your e-mail address here:

Search the Jewish Independent:


 

 

archives

June 18, 2004

Learning the ABCs of theology

Muslims and Jews put faces to faith in mosque meeting to begin dialogue.
PAT JOHNSON SPECIAL TO THE JEWISH BULLETIN

When we learn, we begin with ABC, goes the old children's song. At a deceptively monumental meeting in an East Vancouver mosque recently, Jews and Muslims began with aleph-bet and aleph-ba.

In what sometimes had the flavor of an algebra class mixed with kabbalah and theology, an imam and a rabbi led about 50 people in an introduction to their respective views of Creation. The June 6 event was billed as the first in a series of meetings aimed at bridging a chasm between the two religions. Rabbi David Mivasair of Vancouver's Congregation Ahavat Olam and Imam Fode Drome of Masjid ul-Haqq, spoke on the topic of the Oneness of God and its Universal Message.

The imam expressed the Muslim view that there is just one God, but that God's Creation is multiplicitous.

"When we look at God, we see one," he said. "When we look at Creation, we see many."

Mivasair shared a similar teaching from Judaism, noting that the second letter of the Hebrew aleph-bet, bet, is the foundation of the term bereishit ("In the beginning"). Giving numerical equivalents to letters, which is something that Judaism loves to do, aleph equals one and bet equals two. Mivasair explained the monumental implications of the letter bet, which represents not only the beginning of Creation, but the first sign of multiplicity, when God (one) created the beginning (bet, two) and everything that came after it (the entire aleph-bet and everything that it describes). Drome described a similar Muslim view of unity and multiplicity, insisting that the diversity of the universe is not in contradiction to the oneness of God.

"Difference is not division," said Drome. "God made it to enhance the beauty of Creation. If you had only one color, you would have very little beauty.... The wisdom that God has behind the multicolored manifestation of his
Creation is to make it so beautiful to give us so many choices."

Diversity and multiplicity are not indications that there is no cohesion, the imam suggested, but rather the opposite: reminders that God is universal and is in everything and in many forms. In another interesting parallel, the spiritual leaders noted that both traditions can refer to God in plural form (in Hebrew, Elohim), which seems counterintuitive to monotheistic faiths. But the plural form is not intended to suggest more than one God, said Mivasair, rather it is merely an effort to express the enormity and diversity inherent within the concept of one God.

"The manifestation of one reality can be many," said Drome. "If you have a garden and you plant bananas, you have apples there and grapes, and you water them with the same water, the taste of the fruit is different, but the water is only one: almighty God."

Humans worship God in many ways, the imam added, noting that some people genuflect, some pray standing up while others, like himself, prostrate themselves before God on hands and knees.

Jews and Christians in the audience sometimes shifted uncomfortably – not because of theological challenges, but because they were not as accustomed as their new Muslim friends to sitting cross-legged on the floor. Floor-sitting may have been the most immediate indication of ecumenical multiplicity, but the imam pointed to language as a common barrier to unity. Even so, he and Mivasair noted, most languages and religions have phrases indicating the same concepts. A Muslim audience member asked if her tradition's common use of the term insh'Allah had a parallel Jewish expression. Mivasair responded that the term seems to translate roughly as baruch Hashem, thanks be to God or God willing.

"Many cultures all around the world have these sorts of expressions that tie something in their own lives to something bigger," said the rabbi.

Though Jews and Muslims may imagine they lack common ground, the theological similarities demonstrated Sunday were sometimes startling, such as when the imam expressed the Muslim interpretation that "whoever kills one life it is as if you have killed all life," a view that has an almost verbatim parallel in Judaism.

The afternoon event was originally intended to be a joint walk for peace and reconciliation, but members of the ad hoc group decided such a public demonstration would have more meaning if they first learned more about each other and their beliefs. The atmosphere in the room approached euphoria, as Jews, Muslims and Christians shmoozed over tea and cake after the formal teaching.

Nuzhat Hafeez dropped in to the mosque, expecting a routine Sunday afternoon class and was pleasantly surprised by all the new faces. When told the meeting represented a special joint teaching for Jews and Muslims, Hafeez, who is the director of education for the Burnaby branch of the B.C. Muslim Association, was ecstatic.

"I was so excited," she said. "Like a child would jump and say something good has come to me. This is a great day in Vancouver.... We can remove all the ignorance about each other."

The imam reflected her view, which summed up the intention of the event and those that participants promised will follow in future: "A human being is [the] enemy of what he knows not," said Drome. "We fear what we don't know."

The afternoon was spent laying out the most fundamental principles the two monotheistic faiths share. The group may face more divisive discussions in future – and both sides have spoken of some of the suspicion their efforts at ecumenism have met within their own Jewish and Muslim communities – but the effort to put faces to faiths seemed to get off to a very good start, at the place where such discussions must necessarily commence: In the beginning.

Pat Johnson is a native Vancouverite, a journalist and commentator.

^TOP