The Jewish Independent about uscontact ussearch
Shalom Dancers Dome of the Rock Street in Israel Graffiti Jewish Community Center Kids Wailing Wall
Serving British Columbia Since 1930
homethis week's storiesarchivescommunity calendarsubscribe
 


home > this week's story

 

special online features
faq
about judaism
business & community directory
vancouver tourism tips
links

Search the Jewish Independent:


 

 

archives

July 28, 2006

Talking about identity

Keeping Yiddishkeit alive is a global challenge.
ANNA HAMER

I moved to London from Vancouver a couple of years ago and quickly concluded that British Jews are definitely different. They don't appear to use Yiddish at all and no one has heard about Purell (instant hand sanitizer), either! Recently, an English Jewish friend looked completely baffled when I asked him if he wanted borscht or blintzes for lunch. And so it was with a great deal of interest that I shlepped my way across Regents Park down to the Jewish Museum, a tiny, crooked building squeezed into the back streets of Camden, to hear three eminent professors from the United Kingdom, United States and Canada talk on Jewish identity.

The first speaker was Prof. Jerry Cohen, the Chichele professor of social and political theory at All Soul's College, Oxford. Known in academic circles as a proponent of analytical Marxism, he argues for egalitarianism via the elimination of the injustice of market exchange.

Cohen admitted to a nonreligious life, but a strong Jewish identity. He said he feels more Jewish than Canadian, despite growing up in a Montreal Yiddish communist household. His parents were "militantly anti-religious." His Ukraine-born mother was from a highly educated, wealthy family, but, on moving to Montreal, was forced to work and so became a dressmaker. Apparently, she was very proud to be considered working class.

Cohen attended Morris Winchevsky, a "left-wing" Jewish school in Montreal where he learned about secular Jewishness or Yiddishkeit. Students were instructed in English in the morning and Yiddish in the afternoons. Yiddish classes included subjects such as History of Class Struggle and Cohen began to identify with his own Jewishness via Jewish culture, history, folklore, humor and art. The school's philosophy was to "emphasize the social justice element of our tradition," he said, which seemed to resonate with Cohen's own idea of the Jewish tradition. There was, he added, a natural fit. While not referring directly to the Jewish concept of tikkun olam (repairing the world) in the lecture, he alluded to communist thought as highly congruent with the Jewish idea of striving towards social justice.

Although Cohen said he "cares a lot about the cultural continuity between that tribe in Canaan and me," he does not believe that the secular Jewishness of Yiddishkeit is substainable. In his book, If You're an Egalitarian, How Come You're so Rich?, he writes, "I am Jewish not because I practise the religion, but because I descend from the people who practised the religion – the secular Yiddishkeit in my identity will not last except as an object of academic attention."

Lewis Elton (born Ludwig Ehrenberg), professor of higher education at the University of London, concurred with this idea. He commented that "cultural capital" (thinking and knowledge) defines Jews, but wondered aloud whether Jewishness might disappear as Jews become more assimilated and, therefore, less threatened by anti-Semitism.

Although his family fled from Germany to Prague and finally to England in the years leading up to the Second World War, Elton commented that he only recalls one personal experience of anti-Semitism. He explained how a group of Hitler Youth entered his school and demanded that Jews sit on one side and Aryans on the other. The young Elton decided to sit on the Aryan side because his best friend was "half and half" and was sitting on that side. Several members of the Hitler Youth picked Elton up and moved him to the Jewish side. In response, Elton's "half and half" friend stood up and moved too; he decided to identify with the Jewish side.

The third lecturer, Prof. Art Miller, grew up in the Bronx neighborhood of New York. His casual and slightly tangential speaking style was instantly distinguishable from his more formal Canadian and European counterparts and he warned his audience that he would use "non-PC terms." Although he, too, grew up in a nonreligious family, he described "a typical Jewish household, full of collections of old books and a great respect for learning." His mother gave him "typical Jewish mother advice," such as, "You got a mouth? Use it!" when he was worried about situations like getting lost in the big city.

Miller explained that, growing up, it seemed like everyone in New York was a Jew. Although he played baseball and stickball with some of the Puerto Rican students, most of his friends and neighbors were Jewish. He went to synagogue on the High Holy Days but his family "didn't do Shabbat." When an audience member asked Miller about his Jewish identity, he referred to his love of ideas and suggested that not only does being Jewish encourage one to respect education, but it also teaches one to think critically. Perhaps unsurprisingly, considering their academic occupations, the other two speakers echoed this thought.

All three professors identifed themselves as secular Jews. They did not marry Jewish women and their children were not brought up as Jews. On the surface, there is nothing unusual about this choice, but it does seem slightly incongrous that three men who passionately explain that Jewishness is central to who they are as people should decide against actively passing this on to the next generation. Then again, perhaps an implicit teaching of values is unstoppable. Elton, who firmly supports the idea that "we are People of the Book," said that his non-Jewish son, author and comic Ben Elton, is perhaps more Jewish in the way he thinks and writes than his father.

Anna Hamer is a psychologist and writer based in London.

^TOP