The Jewish Independent about uscontact ussearch
Shalom Dancers Dome of the Rock Street in Israel Graffiti Jewish Community Center Kids Wailing Wall
Serving British Columbia Since 1930
homethis week's storiesarchivescommunity calendarsubscribe
 


home > this week's story

 

special online features
faq
about judaism
business & community directory
vancouver tourism tips
links

Search the Jewish Independent:


 

 

archives

Feb. 16, 2007

Giving the greatest gift of all

Surrogate mothers – Jewish or not – help infertile couples attain their dream of a family.
SORIYA DANIELS

Candy Grover, a Reform Jewish woman from Pepper Pike, Ohio, had experienced terrible complications in both of her pregnancies and her children were born with serious medical problems. Yet she and her husband yearned for another child.

"Rachel," an observant Jewish woman from Brooklyn, N.Y., who desperately wanted a family, was born without a uterus. Both women looked into the possibility of surrogacy – that is, having another woman carry their genetic baby to term.

Candy and Brent Grover decided to use a surrogate after Candy's two pregnancies ended prematurely, resulting in her first son being born with underdeveloped lungs and her second son with cerebral palsy.

"I wanted to know what it was like to have a healthy baby," said Candy.

Twelve years ago, the couple's surrogate, Judy Pietsyzk, gave the Grovers not one, but two healthy (twin) babies. Today, Candy considers Judy her best friend.

"It was awkward when Judy called two weeks after the birth to see the twins," Candy admitted. "They were our babies, but it was her pregnancy."

Candy and Brent are open with their kids and the community about their use of a surrogate. "We're Mommy and Daddy, and you came out of Judy's tummy," is what she told her son and daughter. To find their surrogate, the Grovers placed an ad in the Cleveland Jewish News. They did not have a problem getting the approval of their rabbi, Rabbi Fred Eisenberg of Temple Israel Ner Tamid. In fact, Eisenberg even screened potential surrogates for them.

The Grovers were very lucky all around: Unlike most couples, who can pay up to $70,000 for the entire process, the Grovers paid less than $10,000. Their health insurance paid for the in-vitro cycles, which normally run approximately $10,000 apiece, and Judy, the surrogate, was paid a modest amount to cover her expenses and losses. There was also no agency fee, since the Grovers found the surrogate mother themselves. And they saved money by instructing an attorney to draw up a simple contract, instead of a more complex document.

For anyone considering the surrogacy option, Candy recommended finding a health insurance plan that covers in-vitro fertilization before embarking on this process, as this will drastically reduce costs.

For Rachel, the young woman without a uterus, surrogacy was a little more complicated. In Israel, surrogacy is permitted, state-regulated and under the aegis of the two chief rabbis. In the United States and Canada, there is no consensus among rabbis about the use of surrogates. This is particularly the case among Orthodox rabbis.

Rachel and her husband wanted their own genetic children, but she wouldn't move ahead with surrogacy without rabbinical permission. As an Orthodox Jew of Syrian descent, she didn't want any trouble for her children later on when they went to yeshivah or shul or when they wanted to get married.

Eight years ago, Rachel became the first person in the United States to receive permission from an Orthodox rabbi to proceed with a gestational surrogate.

"I have letters and proof for whenever I need it," she said. "I wanted it documented that my girls can marry a Kohain and my son can be bar mitzvah, and that he could have a bris without questions."

Her story has a happy ending. Her community accepts her and her three children, ages four to seven, who were all born from the womb of the same surrogate mother. "I wouldn't keep it a secret or hide it," Rachel related. "I wouldn't go live in California [where the surrogate mother resided] and come back with a kid."

Other Orthodox couples are not as lucky as Rachel, mainly because most rabbis have more questions than answers.

"It's not a question of rabbis not wanting to rule on it. It's just a part of Jewish law that they're unfamiliar with," explained Kenneth Brander, rabbi of the Boca Raton Synagogue in Florida.

The leader of a 700-family Orthodox shul is one of the few rabbis specifically trained in this area. Later this year, he will become a dean at Yeshivah University, charged with establishing an institute there to educate other rabbis on the confounding issues associated with infertility.

Searching for a surrogate to carry the baby is not the first thing that you do, said Brander. This is the remaining option when everything else is exhausted, he explained.

The Conservative movement's Rabbinical Assembly Committee on Jewish Law and Standards notes that surrogacy entails serious potential problems that would make it inappropriate in some cases. That is why, said Rabbi Stephen Weiss of Congregation B'nai Jeshurun in New York, surrogacy is "permissable but not required" of an infertile couple trying to fulfil the biblical obligation to procreate.

"There are very real concerns about exploitation of the surrogate and the potential risk that the child will be rejected by the parents should it be born disabled," he said. "But research has shown that these circumstances arise in only a small minority of cases, and they can be addressed by civil law."

Nishmat, the women's online information centre, which is a project of the Jerusalem Centre for Advanced Jewish Study for Women, insists that each case must be discussed individually with a rabbi well-versed in this subject.

While some rabbis hold that the great benefit of providing a child to an infertile couple is decisive, others voice concerns about potential exploitation of the surrogate.

"You can't treat the surrogate like she's being used. She's not hired help," said Rachel, who maintains a close friendship with her surrogate.

Rachel found her surrogate through a Los Angeles-based agency, the Centre for Surrogate Parenting. She was looking for someone who had been a surrogate before, so the woman would know what to expect, and was willing to do it again. An agency also provides a social worker to help the parties work out sticky situations, like who gets to hold the baby first.

When the couple wanting a baby uses an agency, the surrogate chooses whom she wants to do this for, not the other way around. However, the intended parents can veto any potential surrogate. It's a matter of supply and demand, explained Rachel. "There are more needy couples than willing surrogates."

The issue of paying someone to have a baby for you poses some thorny issues in Jewish law. Former chief rabbi of Great Britain Immanuel Jakobovits is vociferously against surrogacy for this very reason. He has declared that "to use another person as an 'incubator' and then take from her the child she carried and delivered for a fee is a revolting degradation of maternity and an affront to human dignity."

Other rabbis have gotten around this by insisting that payment to a surrogate be a reasonable sum for her services, which is separate and distinct from payment for a child. It is permissible, they say, to pay a woman for time engaged in medical, psychological and legal procedures, to reimburse her for lost wages and to pay restitution for physical restrictions due to pregnancy, as well as for medical risks undertaken and for the use of her womb.

The complexity of the issues involved in infertility treatments, including surrogacy, led to the inauguration of the widely accepted Puah Institute in Israel, which forged consensus among all the country's major rabbinic authorities.

"The real question is to determine who is the halachic [by Jewish law] mother," said Rabbi Gideon Weitzman, head of the English-speaking section of Puah. That seems to be the lingering question for most rabbis, although the sole position approved by the Rabbinical Assembly Committee on Jewish Law and Standards is that the religious status of a child follows that of the birth mother in cases involving surrogacy, as in all other cases, such as when a mother gives birth to a child using donor eggs or embryos.

Brander would likely allow a surrogacy arrangement "following the strictest parameters of halachah, which would indicate that it is the host [not the genetic egg giver] that's the mother." Therefore, he insists on converting the baby to Judaism if the surrogate mother is not Jewish.

Brander recognizes, however, that there are different approaches as to who is considered the mother according to Jewish law: "Some say both, some say neither, some say the genetic giver, but most say the host mother," he said.

Maternity is important in determining the religion of the child, whom the child can marry, mourning obligations and lineage. It can also cause serious complications in the case of a Jewish surrogate wanting to keep the child after birth, since, according to Jewish law, the baby would likely be deemed hers and the intended father's.

This issue has arisen in Israel, where on occasion the surrogates, single Jewish women, decide to keep the baby. (Married Jewish women are forbidden to serve as surrogates due to the potential for mamzerut – illegitimate children – being born. The marital status of a non-Jewish surrogate, however, has no bearing, since Jewish law does not apply to her.)

"A lot of people who want to follow Jewish law are struggling and searching, and not only in the Orthodox community," said Brander. "I get phone calls from couples in the Conservative and Reform communities because people want to make sure their children are Jewish."

Still, all of that research and effort is "definitely worth it," declared Rachel, "because I have my family now."

Soriya Daniels is a freelance writer based in Aventura, Fla.

^TOP