|
|
February 8, 2002
A grotesque comparison
Editorial
The way humans treat animals is the same as the way the Nazis treated
Jews. In fact, the two cases are directly linked - Hitler used high-tech
killing techniques learned from Chicago slaughterhouses as part
of his Final Solution and the meat industry continues to use the
same processes.
That is the thesis, in a nutshell, of a book being released this
month, titled Eternal Treblinka: Our Treatment of Animals and
the Holocaust. The author, Dr. Charles Patterson, based his
title on a line from the Isaac Bashevis Singer short story "The
Letter Writer," in which a Holocaust survivor befriends a mouse,
who soon dies:
"In his thoughts, Herman spoke a eulogy for the mouse who had
shared a portion of his life with him and who, because of him, had
left this earth. 'What do they know - all these scholars, all these
philosophers, all the leaders of the world - about such as you?
They have convinced themselves that man, the worst transgressor
of all the species, is the crown of creation. All other creatures
were created merely to provide him with food, pelts, to be tormented,
exterminated. In relation to them, all people are Nazis; for the
animals it is an eternal Treblinka.' "
Singer's own dedication to animal rights is given much play in the
book, but there is no leeway given for the fact that the title derives
from a work of fiction and the context may not be transferable.
Patterson, undeterred, goes on to criticize "human supremacy,"
indicating that he makes little distinction between the life of
a human and the life of a pig. He directly compares human slavery
through history to current captivity of animals. He equates the
eugenics movement with animal breeders cross-breeding better classes
of animals. Most disturbingly and unforgivably, he repeatedly juxtaposes
the grotesque imagery of the Chicago stockyards - with its squealing
pigs and brutal, routinized death - with the Nazi death camps.
The ideological intent of the book is to take the universal disgust
for fascism and sympathy for its victims and transfer it to the
ongoing campaign for humane treatment of animals. Comparing the
mass murder of humans to the industrialized processing of meat animals
is intended to raise human consciousness about our treatment of
animals. Instead, it succeeds only in massively degrading the victims
of the Holocaust and turning sensible readers, in their revulsion,
against the author and his thesis.
It is true that our treatment of animals is often cruel, inhumane
and appalling. It should be reformed. But comparing it with the
Holocaust is animal rights extremism at its ideological worst.
The early part of the book deals with the methods people have used
to dehumanize other people, referring to enemies as savages, brutes
or beasts. Patterson points out the methods the Nazis used in propaganda
films, which equated Jews with rats and, using a more recent case,
the manner in which Hutus depicted Tutsis as insects. This is all
part of an intellectual process to make it easier and more acceptable
to kill the now-dehumanized enemy. But it is also a facile thesis.
Yes, that dehumanizing propaganda is intended to reduce sympathy
for and incite hatred against groups. But it can only succeed in
a situation that is already ripe for murder, something Patterson
doesn't acknowledge.
The author makes much of the fact that Henry Ford got his ideas
for assembly-line production from his visit to a Chicago slaughterhouse
as a young man. He also notes that Hitler got his ideas for assembly-line
killing from Ford's industrial model. Neither of these facts are
new. And if they were, so what? Patterson's emphasis on the process
of killing, rather than the human motivations behind it, is one
of the failures of the book.
Moreover, the implication is that the Holocaust continues today
in the form of the meat industry. It is a grotesque appropriation
of history.
Unfortunately, such a thesis is likely to be met with interest in
some quarters. In a world where people are seeking answers from
the likes of David Icke, and animal rights extremists threaten to
kill people to save animals, there may just be a place for Eternal
Treblinka.
^TOP
|
|