The Jewish Independent about uscontact ussearch
Shalom Dancers Dome of the Rock Street in Israel Graffiti Jewish Community Center Kids Wailing Wall
Serving British Columbia Since 1930
homethis week's storiesarchivescommunity calendarsubscribe
 


home > this week's story

 

special online features
faq
about judaism
business & community directory
vancouver tourism tips
links

Search the Jewish Independent:


 

 

archives

Dec. 22, 2006

Proud of being Jewish

Barbra Streisand rejected Hollywood stereotypes.
EUGENE KAELLIS

One would have to live in some obscure and inaccessible part of the world to be unaware of the professional and even personal life of Barbra Streisand. She is a superstar and everything from the way she decorates her house, to her romances and married life, to her generous charitable donations and her frequent political forays is news. But Streisand is also a phenomenon and one that says something about our culture and entertainment industry.

Streisand's achievement is not only her success, but her major contribution to helping rid our consciousness of the "preferred" appearance, carefully and consistently cultivated by the moguls of the entertainment industry since its inception: the requirement that a star be beautiful, or handsome, in the stereotypical sense – light-skinned and light-haired, with no tangible ethnicity. It was an image Broadway and, especially Hollywood, with its much larger, less sophisticated audiences and its facial closeups, developed and catered to for decades. Its source was a widespread ethnic and racial bias that masqueraded as taste and which, though considerably diminished, still exists.

Almost from its beginning, American mass entertainment counted Jews among its most important entrepreneurs. They helped develop the stereotype, not only because they assumed it would be good for business, but because, at that time, many Jews themselves weren't keen about "looking Jewish." Their romantic fantasies involved women quite unlike their wives, sisters or mothers. In this hierarchy of stereotypes, looking Jewish was only a level above looking black. Streisand, who described herself as "mieskeit" ("ugliness"), ignored frequent advice to get "a nose job" – she still has an "imperfect" nose, a cast to her right eye, a wide mouth with prominent lips and a body not voluptuous by "standard" feminine beauty criteria.

Have we vanquished stereotyped beauty yet? Not by a long shot. Cosmetic surgery is booming. Women (and men) spend time, effort and money in prodigious amounts for makeovers, makeup, hair products and a plethora of rejuvenation nostrums in an attempt to approximate being thin, young and Anglo-Saxon looking.

It's no accident that the first appearance of a black romantic star, Sidney Poitier, in a Hollywood movie about interracial love, happened around the same time that Streisand was able to break into show business, starring as comedienne Fanny Brice in Funny Girl. It was 1964, near the height of the civil rights movement, when stereotypes were breaking down and it was in New York City, with its large Jewish population. She won the part over two major contenders: Anne Bancroft and Mary Martin, both famous, "good-looking," highly competent stars. Brice was not your typical ingenue – she was a comic; nonetheless, casting Streisand was a major breakthrough, not only for her, but for all non-"standard"-looking people.

Many of Streisand's film roles were Jewish, even when they didn't have to be: Susan Lowenstein in The Prince of Tides and Katie Morosky, the perennial radical, in The Way We Were, for example. One can't be sure, but it seems that it was her idea to have the characters be Jewish.

Streisand hasn't please everyone. Notably, Isaac B. Singer, who wrote the story on which Yentl was based, didn't like her singing in the movie, but the public did; it was a huge success.

Streisand unquestionably has a superlative and unique talent. However, if you have observed the world for some time, you have probably realized that the world is up to its proverbial hind quarters in talent. You may also have noticed that the way our culture and entertainment industries are structured allows only a small part of this gigantic, and growing, pool of talent to be expressed and an even smaller part to be acclaimed. In order for talent to be transmuted to success (fame, fortune), there has to be opportunity, but the ratio of talent to opportunity is so huge that, except for rare circumstances, the only way talent can be recognized and rewarded is by determination and/or luck.

Luck is, by definition, rare. To be effective, determination needs large measures of health and stamina. Streisand excelled in both. Gifted she was, in variety and in abundance, but, as essential as this was to her success, determination was the key. In spite of starkly difficult circumstances and little formal training, she simply seized or created what miniscule opportunities were initially available to her and elbowed her way to the top.

Streisand's circumstances strongly disfavored her. Her mother, who consistently discouraged Streisand's decision to be in show business, was poor, widowed after a short marriage, with two children, the second from a disastrous second marriage that ended in a bitter divorce. Through all of this, Streisand, starting in early childhood, persisted and persisted with something approaching a maniacal belief in her objective, perhaps even her destiny.

The ecology of art, music, literature, entertainment and sports is similar to that of industry. Indeed, they are industry. And, just as top executives command fabulous rewards in business, so do members of the upper echelon of the "star system." The consequence is that much – perhaps most – talent is left to wither and die in the cold, while only a small part is cultivated, watered and, most of all, nurtured with publicity until it develops strong roots and impressive foliage. It pays to promote stars. After they reach a certain level of fame, their publicity becomes self-generating and they have been transformed into a good "properties."

So intent was Streisand to act that she didn't realize that her singing voice was her really distinct talent. Desperate for money, she entered and won a singing contest at a New York City Greenwich Village gin joint. She couldn't read music but had a remarkable memory and a unique and impressive style. Only after sustained effort by her agent was she eventually able to get a contract with the hesitant executives at Columbia Records. If you want to experience the full intensity of the inimitable passion and power Streisand brings to her music, try her 1972 release, Higher Ground, especially "Avinu Malkeinu," part of the Rosh Hashanah service, sung in Hebrew.

Streisand is also often unintentionally funny; an irrepressible and impish comic muse emerging unexpectedly from her usually concealed naïveté and insecurity. In almost any circumstance, she seems to be on the edge of mirth.

As "unfair" as our current enterprise system of entertainment and culture is, it is an improvement on what it replaced: the patronage and indulgence of powerful men, sacred or profane, who controlled their beneficiaries. The Streisand story is a microcosm of our contemporary system of discovering talent and rewarding it. It works for some, and for their success we are grateful, because they provide us with satisfying, and sometimes even elevating, means by which to enjoy our leisure time. The others we will never hear about.

Eugene Kaellis is a retired academic living in New Westminster.

^TOP