data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d851/6d851ff87f4b49614c8ccc1213e66ae08b169380" alt=""
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/afa44/afa44e6ef93ea45ff7476f50ec36d334bbcdc0fb" alt="archives"
April 14, 2006
Not kosher NPA'sach
Editorial
Last November, at an all-candidates' meeting at the Jewish Community
Centre of Greater Vancouver (JCC), Sam Sullivan boasted of the support
he had in the Jewish community.
Sullivan went on to win the election and now wears the chain of
office as mayor of Vancouver. He is presumed to have taken a sizeable
chunk of the Jewish vote a bloc that may be larger than the
number of votes James Green took from Jim Green. Yet in one of the
first major events sponsored by the NPA since regaining civic government
in November's election, the NPA scheduled its annual general meeting
for the first night of Pesach.
Such scheduling would be thoughtless at the best of times. But it
is particularly galling mere months after a significant, probably
unprecedented, groundswell of support among Jewish Vancouverites
helped put Sullivan in the mayor's chair and arguably elected an
NPA majority to council, parks board and school board. Prominent
Jewish leaders very publicly backed Sullivan, publishing third-party
advertising in this newspaper and others supporting Sullivan and
calling on Jewish voters to join them in supporting the NPA. Herb
Silber, past-president of the JCC, and Jeffrey Goldberg, chair of
the Combined Jewish Appeal campaign, circulated widely an e-mail
of support for Sullivan, albeit in the capacity of private citizens.
Senior NPA officials tell the Independent that the date was chosen
based on the availability of the space, Heritage Hall on Main Street,
where the meeting is to be held. (The NPA, if it ever was a West
Side club, has made a point of holding major events on the Eastside
in recent years.) When the availability was offered, the board did
not realize that the date was Passover, said the official.
The apology from NPA brass seems heartfelt and genuine enough. Dumb
mistake is the defence. The civic governing party promises to consult
their multicultural calendars in future.
The problem is, this is not the first time this has happened. Far
more egregiously, the NPA held a fund-raising celebration last year
on Kol Nidre. One such scheduling error may be understandable and
forgivable. Twice and it begins to look like a trend.
Certainly, NPA leaders say, the date was not chosen deliberately,
or for some sinister political reason. It was an oversight. But
it demonstrates a lack of sensitivity and a sloppiness that probably
shouldn't be happening at this level of politics in a city that
boasts such proud diversity.
Scheduling a major civic event at a time when a significant number
of interested citizens will be precluded from attending based on
membership in a cultural or religious community is insensitive,
but it's not exactly tsuris of unprecedented proportions. Most of
Vancouver's Jews probably don't care when the NPA holds its meetings.
But the scheduling snafu, however unintentional, is a strange repayment
to a community that gave so much so recently to the NPA.
While the NPA leadership has promised such an oversight will never
happen again, perhaps it is the responsibility of Jewish NPAers
to make sure this is the case. The lesson here may be that the best
way for a political organization to appropriately reflect the needs
and sensitivities of a cultural community is for members of that
community to integrate themselves into the decision-making structure
of the party and not just send money and supportive e-mails
at election time.
While the timing of a political party's meeting may not be the most
dramatic issue this community will face this year, it nonetheless
suggests that a core principle of Canadian multiculturalism
that reasonable accommodations be made to meet the specific needs
of a cultural community has not been structurally integrated
into the party that runs this city.
In the end, reasonable accommodation is really all that the Jewish
community has ever asked of its elected officials. It should not
be too much to expect. This is why this incident has struck such
a chord: first Yom Kippur, then Pesach. Three strikes and this community
might actually get angry.
^TOP
|
|