The Western Jewish Bulletin about uscontact ussearch
Shalom Dancers Dome of the Rock Street in Israel Graffiti Jewish Community Center Kids Wailing Wall
Serving British Columbia Since 1930
homethis week's storiesarchivescommunity calendarsubscribe
 


home > this week's story

 

special online features
faq
about judaism
business & community directory
vancouver tourism tips
links

Sign up for our e-mail newsletter. Enter your e-mail address here:



Search the Jewish Independent:


 

 

archives

April 20, 2001
Israel Anniversary

Libs may repeal hate law

A Campbell regime would review B.C.'s rights code.
PAT JOHNSON REPORTER

The Liberal most likely to be the province's next attorney general says his party is considering removing from the Human Rights Code segments that deal with hate propaganda.

Geoff Plant, MLA for Richmond-Steveston, said the caucus has not made a final decision on the issue, but has considered taking out aspects of the code that are popular among some ethnic communities.

"At this point, what I can say is we're looking at that provision of the code," he told the Bulletin.

The legislation was the tool used to bring former North Shore News columnist Doug Collins before a tribunal, which decreed that he had written anti-Semitic materials.

Section 7 of the Human Rights Code prohibits "the publication, issue or display of discriminatory material ... that is likely to expose [a person or a group or class of persons] to hatred or contempt because of [their] race, color, ancestry, place of origin, religion, marital status, family status, physical or mental disability, sex, sexual orientation or age...."

The provisions have been criticized by civil libertarians and others for going too far and for leaving important decisions on the issue to a quasi-judicial government appointee. It has also been criticized as redundant because the federal Criminal Code already has provisions to deal with hate propaganda.

Plant said the Liberal party, should it come to power as is widely expected, would review the legislation to see if it strikes the right balance between monitoring public hatred and protecting free speech.

Among the concerns Plant expressed was that the legislation could be interpreted to include comments made in private.

But the statement has raised the concern of Canadian Jewish Congress. Along with the Chinese-Canadian agency SUCCESS, CJC held a meeting with numerous Liberal MLAs and candidates earlier this month. Neither Plant nor Gordon Campbell raised the issue then.

"It's not in line with the discussions that we had at the meeting," said Herb Silber, honorary legal counsel for CJC, Pacific Region. He said the Liberals expressed concerns about the process by which the code is enforced, but said the MLAs and candidates in attendance at the April 2 breakfast meeting fundamentally agreed with the Human Rights Code itself. CJC was a strong supporter of the provision to include remedies for hate literature when the Human Rights Act was amended in 1997 and renamed the Human Rights Code.

"The thrust of that section we obviously welcomed when it was brought in by the government," said Silber. "If it's a matter of rescinding it, we would want to have some input on that."

Tony DuMoulin, a Vancouver lawyer and an officer of CJC, shared Silber's concerns about Plant's comments to the Bulletin. He said the human rights legislation is important because it offers easier and quicker access than the criminal courts system to people who believe they have been discriminated against.

CJC and SUCCESSS also met with New Democratic candidates and MLAs, including Graeme Bowbrick, the attorney general and minister responsible for human rights.

Bowbrick assailed Plant, saying his comments show he is out-of-touch with ordinary people. He told the Bulletin that his Liberal opponents hope to sail into office by speaking in generalities such as saying they would reconsider the code, without specifying what exactly they would do.

"They're also so supremely confident of their victory, I just hope they will get into specifics," said Bowbrick. He dismissed complaints that the code infringes on free speech, saying that is protected under the Constitution.

^TOP