April 13, 2001
Hypocrisy in the Mideast
Israel is being criticized for expanding two settlements in the
so-called occupied territories. The Housing Ministry is planning
to add 496 new homes in Ma'ale Adumim, which is to the east of Jerusalem,
and 212 in Alfei Menashe, close to Nablus.
Settlements in the territories are a flashpoint in the dispute
between Palestinians and Israel, seen by the Arabs as a sign that
Israel does not intend to cede the land any time soon. The expansion
of these two settlements is seen as an act of bad faith by Israel
and was criticized last week by the American administration as having
the possibility of "further inflaming" the situation in
that troubled place.
However, the construction is to take place in existing settlements
in response to what Israeli officials call natural population growth.
Moreover, the two settlements are in areas that are likely to remain
part of Israel, should a Palestinian state ever become a reality.
Critics will say we can't presume which parts of the occupied territories
will remain part of Israel, because no firm map has ever been created
to determine which territory would be Palestinian and which would
be Israeli.
Yet the criticism would be laughable, were the issue not so critical.
If Israel's actions are in bad faith, how on earth would we characterize
Palestinian actions?
This intifada is the ultimate act of bad faith. As the two sides
were closer than ever to attaining a settlement that could result
in a lasting peace, Palestinians - incited by their religious and
political leaders - picked up rocks and pummelled the peace process
to death.
Under the circumstances, all bets are off. Palestinian authorities
lost their moral right to call Israel's kettle black when they launched
this latest round of violence.
The United States can say what it wants about the situation, but
Israel has no obligation to abide by the tenets of the abandoned
peace proposals.
Had the peace efforts prevailed, there might have been a rudimentary
Palestinian state emerging right now. Had Yasser Arafat had the
courage to transform himself from a terrorist to a political leader,
this whole story would have a diametrically opposed conclusion.
If all those things had happened, we would have enthusiastically
joined the United States in criticizing Israel's expansion of the
two settlements. Then Israel would have been in the wrong.
They didn't. We won't. It isn't.
^TOP
|