The Western Jewish Bulletin about uscontact ussearch
Shalom Dancers Dome of the Rock Street in Israel Graffiti Jewish Community Center Kids Wailing Wall
Serving British Columbia Since 1930
homethis week's storiesarchivescommunity calendarsubscribe
 


home > this week's story

 

special online features
faq
about judaism
business & community directory
vancouver tourism tips
links

Sign up for our e-mail newsletter. Enter your e-mail address here:

Search the JWB web site:


 

 

archives

Feb. 24, 2006

Defending our freedom

Three Canadian papers reprint cartoons.
DAVE GORDON

Worldwide riots have been the main reaction to the Danish cartoons portraying Mohammed. Yet despite the news coverage of the rioting, most media in North America have refused to reprint the perceived catalyst for the outrage.

In Canada, just three publications, the Western Standard, Calgary's Jewish Free Press and a student paper in Prince Edward Island, reprinted the cartoons. In the United States, there were a handful, including the Philadelphia Inquirer, New York Sun and Daily Illini, whose editor was fired as a result.

The controversy started when Danish author Kåre Bluitgen complained that he could not find an artist to illustrate his book about Mohammed. The newspaper Jyllands-Posten issued a call for submissions from artists in order to determine if anyone would be brave enough to draw Mohammed.

They printed the now-infamous 12 editorial cartoons in September 2005. An Egyptian newspaper reprinted them soon after, without incident. It was when European papers began reprinting the cartoons three months later that rioting began. Imams distributed three incendiary fakes in the Middle East and it is believed that those, too, inflamed Muslims. Western media outlets began covering the issue as riots began throughout the Middle East, however most abstained from reprinting the cartoons.

Ezra Levant, publisher of the Western Standard magazine in Calgary, said his decision had nothing to do with jumping on the bandwagon. He expected his fortnightly magazine, from print-time to shipping, would ultimately be behind the pack.

Levant said he believes reprinting the cartoons is essential to properly telling that news story. "We're not running them out of agreement," he said. "We're running them as a central fact of the story: Muslim riots and reaction. We published them as a symbol of freedom of the press, in defiance of those around the world who would censor us through threats of violence."

The cartoons are tucked in the middle of the magazine.

After a few hundred calls about the cartoons, Levant said that support has been 40 to 1 in favor of the publication. Little negative reaction has arisen, despite some newsstands that have pulled the issue and a few complaints. Out of 40,000 copies printed, he said a total of 50 copies were removed from stores.

"The purpose of the censors is obvious: hurt our magazine economically and make an example of us as a warning to all other media," he said. "I never imagined that we would have been at the centre of a fight for our culture's basic freedoms – or that the rest of Canada's media would be so silent, leaving us to fight this fight by ourselves."

A Calgary Muslim leader has tried to get the Western Standard charged with hate crimes. And a complaint was filed against with the Human Rights Commission on the same grounds, according to Levant.

"Those are nuisance suits, of course," he said. "But the idea is to cost us money and time, break our spirit, erode our freedom of speech and teach a lesson to all other media: that anyone who doesn't censor themselves will be made to wish they did."

As for the reactions worldwide to the reprintings, Levant said only the rioters are to blame.

"Cartoons don't kill people; people do. I've read a lot of cartoons and I've never seen a cartoon that torches embassies," Levant said.

Richard Bronstein, editor of the Jewish Free Press, also defended his position, saying it was more than just a freedom of speech issue. "These protests were happening because of 12 negative portrayals? I just simply said, 'I don't believe you,' " Bronstein declared.

He said that there was no reason for anyone in Canada to publish them and no reason for any Jewish periodical to publish them either, "but when Muslims worldwide are being duplicitous about this issue, we have to pull the camera back and take a wide shot," he said. "No Jew ever rioted because of a cartoon. And there was no outcry before when thousands of other drawings of Mohammed were printed over history."

To prove his point, along with a few of the Mohammed cartoons, Bronstein printed historical artistic portrayals of the prophet – including TV's recent South Park animated version – and juxtaposed them with virulently anti-Semitic editorial cartoons the likes of which are printed daily in the Arab and European press. Some of the latter were, "as bad as the infamous Der Stermer Jew from Nazi-era Germany," he said, referencing the infamous propaganda newspaper.

Syed Soharwardi, the president of the Islamic Supreme Council of Canada, complained recently about the Free Press to the Alberta Human Rights Commission, but the public prosecutor deemed the cartoons not hateful.

"We should not be stampeded into taking one side or another of a controversy," Bronstein said. "In that context, it is permissible and advisable to give us access to information. Gather facts, debate and discuss freely and make your own conclusions."

The Progressive Muslim Union of North America (PMUNA) has issued its own statement on the matter. "These cartoons pander to the basest prejudices, defaming the Prophet's character with gross stereotypes of Arab culture, equating the mistakes of his followers with his personage," they have written on their website. "The actions of Prophet Mohammed's followers, however, are no less an insult to him."

However, PMUNA said it extols freedom of the press.

The statement continued, "We must defend the right of cartoonists to draw satirical, biting, even blasphemous commentary and the right of papers to publish items which may be offensive or perceived as heretical by some. A society without such freedom rapidly becomes poisonously repressed.... But at the same time, we must insist that the practice of freedom of expression must be responsible."

Dave Gordon is a freelance writer whose work has appeared in the Baltimore Sun, Forward and Toronto Sun.

^TOP