|
|
February 27, 2004
Passion: A rabbi's view
RABBI BARRY LEFF SPECIAL TO THE JEWISH BULLETIN
Mel Gibson's new movie The Passion of the Christ is the
goriest movie I've seen in some time. Many Christians complain (quite
rightly) about excessive violence in movies and on TV, and I question
whether putting the violence in a religious context somehow makes
it acceptable. However, as a rabbi, my interest in the movie centres
on two other issues: Will it encourage anti-Semitism? What impact
will the movie have on Jewish-Christian relations?
I do not think the movie will encourage a big rise in anti-Semitism.
Anti-Semites do not need a movie or further excuses to hate Jews.
Christians who do not hate Jews today will not come out of the movie
hating Jews everything in the movie is an old, well-known
story. I am confident that the average Christian of today is more
sophisticated than the average Christian who watched the passion
plays in the Middle Ages. Moreover, it wasn't the plays themselves
that caused the violence, it was the anti-Semitic sermons that went
with them.
The impact the movie will have on Jewish-Christian relations, or
on how Christians understand Jesus, is probably not much. That
is the real pity here.
Movie is midrash, interpretation. Gibson decided to write his own
midrash on the death of Jesus. The sad thing is that the movie relies
on all the old stereotypes. The Jews are wicked and bloodthirsty.
The Roman soldiers are sadistic. Mary is dressed in an outfit that
looks like a nun's habit. Caiaphas leads a kangaroo court. Pilate
is made far more sympathetic than in scripture.
Gibson had an opportunity to take the story in a different direction.
Ever since Nostra Aetate, the Catholic church's groundbreaking statement
in 1965 that absolved Jews of responsibility for the death of Jesus,
interest has grown among Christians in understanding Jesus' Jewish
roots.
Gibson's midrash echoes the old anti-Semitism because it continues
to treat "the Jews" as a group totally distinct from Jesus
and his disciples. That's not accurate: Jesus was a Jew. In the
movie, in the Aramaic, his disciples call him rabbi, you lose a
little of the flavor of that when you read the subtitle "teacher."
If you read the Gospels as internal criticism, Jew criticizing Jew,
it does not read as any more anti-Semitic than Isaiah or Jeremiah.
But if you read it as an outside group ("Christians")
criticizing a different group ("Jews"), it does read as
anti-Semitic.
Everything we know about Jesus suggests that he was an observant
Jew who kept the commandments. In Matthew, he is quoted as saying
he did not come to abolish the law, but to fulfil it. A few more
scenes perhaps one with Jesus washing his hands and reciting
the blessing for eating bread, and a scene that showed Caiaphas
and others doing the same would have reinforced the message
that this was a struggle among Jews.
But the movie fails to provide a context and it fails to provide
details that are readily available from Jewish sources. If Gibson
had drawn on some additional sources, such as the Mishnah, he could
have learned how the Sanhedrin, the Jewish High Court, functioned
in the late Second Temple period. He could have stayed true to the
story in the Gospels, but informed his interpretation with other
sources that show the Jews in a much more sympathetic light.
Why did Caiaphas want Jesus executed? No one would be put to death
for claiming to be the Messiah Judaism has had lots of people
making that claim. The real issue was Jesus claiming to be God,
therefore leading people into idol worship, because only God is
God. This was glossed over in the movie. Jesus was also accused
of sorcery, likewise a capital offence at the time.
Gibson did one thing to try and mitigate the potential of the film
to incite anti-Semitism. The line "his blood be upon us"
is still in the movie, but only in Aramaic. Even so, I suspect Christians
will hear it in their head when they see the scene, as it is a well-known
verse in Matthew.
The Passion is an excursion down an unfortunate path blazed
by Constantine in the fourth century, emphasizing the cross and
the death of Jesus over his life. It shows Jesus' life as being
salvation through his suffering, instead of his life as an inspirational
example for how to treat others. It would have been better for all
of us Jews, Christians and everyone else if Gibson
had chosen to focus his cinematic talents on love, tolerance and
forgiveness, rather than on pain, suffering and brutality. But maybe
that is asking too much of someone whose career was made by Lethal
Weapon.
Rabbi Barry Leff is the spiritual leader of Congregation
Beth Tikvah in Richmond.
^TOP
|
|