The Western Jewish Bulletin about uscontact ussearch
Shalom Dancers Dome of the Rock Street in Israel Graffiti Jewish Community Center Kids Wailing Wall
Serving British Columbia Since 1930
homethis week's storiesarchivescommunity calendarsubscribe
 


home > this week's story

 

special online features
faq
about judaism
business & community directory
vancouver tourism tips
links

Sign up for our e-mail newsletter. Enter your e-mail address here:

Search the Jewish Independent:


 

 

archives

February 6, 2004

Spam mailing ethics addressed

Judaic principles can be used as a guide in modern business practises.
RABBI DR. ASHER MEIR SPECIAL TO THE JEWISH BULLETIN

Targeted mailings are a legitimate selling technique according to the principles of Judaism. But these mailings turn into unethical harassment when no effort is made to target individuals who would be expected to have some interest in learning about your product, or if the message is misleading or sent in an illegal fashion.

Should someone take advantage of making a pitch through a "spam" mailing to millions of individuals? In principle, Jewish tradition does not frown on promotion. It is legitimate for sellers to try and make their products known to potential buyers and to inform buyers of the benefits of their wares. For example, the Mishnah (at the end of fourth chapter of Bava Metzia) states that a storeowner is allowed to give free gifts to buyers in order to induce them to come to his store. And our ancient sages took special steps to encourage door-to-door salesmen who sold important products, such as cosmetics, which were not available in stores. (Bava Batra 22a)

However, we must take care that selling doesn't turn into harassment. We can learn this principle from two laws of commerce that relate to buyers and applying them to sellers as well.

The Mishnah states that a buyer shouldn't waste the time of a seller by feigning interest in a purchase. (Bava Metzia) This is considered a violation of the Torah prohibition of causing gratuitous torment to others. The sellers devote their energy to the customer believing they are being given a fair chance to make a sale; if in fact the "customer" has no interest, then the sellers are being imposed upon. Customers should take the time of a seller only if they have at least some minimal interest in buying.

By the same token, a seller shouldn't waste the customer's time by an offering when there is no particular basis for thinking that the customer might be interested. There should be some rational basis for assuming that the e-mail (or junk mail) recipients may have some interest in your product or service. Otherwise, you are imposing on the recipient.

There is another, complementary law that provides a complementary insight. One of the Ten Commandments is "Don't covet" what belongs to our neighbor. (Exodus 20:14) But we must admit that giving a hard and fast definition of "coveting" is not so easy. Our tradition tells us that the line is definitely crossed when our desire is so great that we try to convince the owner to sell us a personal possession with which he/she really has no interest in parting. (Mechilta on Exodus 20:14) Such uninvited approaches are again really just a form of harassment.

This law too can be extrapolated from buyer to seller. Someone who tries to convince people to buy a product that they have shown no interest in acquiring is engaging in exactly the same kind of harassment. (Pitchei Choshen Geneiva 30:26) This is completely different from a salesperson trying to persuade customers who have intentionally come into the store or who have agreed to listen to a salesperson's pitch.

It's hard to provide a clear definition of when targeted marketing turns into spam, but the two sources from Jewish law can help provide some context. In both cases, the criterion that makes the approach permissible is not a desire to make a deal per se but rather the existence of a basic interest. Customers who have some interest in making a purchase are not wasting the salesperson's time, and people who have expressed even a possible interest in selling their property may be approached by someone with an interesting offer.

By the same token, recipients consider an e-mail to be "spam" not because they don't want to buy the product but rather because they are not interested in even learning about the product. It's not only a waste of their time to read the message; it's even a waste of time to go to the trouble of deleting it.

Based on this criterion, a mass mailing would be problematic if it is for something that relatively few people are interested in learning about and no efforts are made to target specifically those individuals who would express interest.

It goes without saying that the message should not be misleading, tricking the recipient into reading the message by camouflaging it as a message which is of interest, such as a business or personal communication, winning a contest, etc. This violates the prohibition of geneivat da'at (misleading others).

It also goes without saying that the mailing should not violate the law. Very often middlemen use illegal techniques to evade the anti-spam efforts of Internet service providers. For example, they use a false return address. When you use the services of such an agent, Jewish law views you as an accomplice to the crime.

Rabbi Dr. Asher Meir is director of the Business Response Forum at the Centre for Business Ethics, Jerusalem College of Technology (JCT). He is also a senior lecturer in economics at the JCT and has published several articles on the subjects of modern business and economics and Jewish law. This article was published by the JCT and distributed by the Kaddish Connection Network.

^TOP